Lava launched Z25 in 15-20K price segment. In this price segment it shall compete with Gionee S6s, Oppo f1s, Vivo V5, Samsung J7 prime and Oppo A57.
Lava Z25 is strategically placed at price segment of 17,000. Only Gionee S6s is at lower price @ 16000. However Gionee S6s has 3 GB RAM while Z 25 is equipped with 4GB RAM.
All models in this segment are 5” plus screen size so is Z25.
Rear camera 13 MP sony IMX258 1/3.06” PDAF , F 2.0 is better than S6s and J7 prime.
Front Camera is 8 MP, while Oppo A57, Vivo V5 and Oppo F1s offer much better camera in this segment.
It offers 4GB Ram better than 3 GB RAM of Gionee S6s, Samsung J7 prime and Oppo A57 and equivalent to Oppo F1s and Vivo V5.
Chipset : Better than Samsung J7 prime in Multi-tasking. Better than Gionee S6s in App loading time and gaming performance.
Detail product Comparison is here for reference and quick review.
Parameter | Lava Z25 | Gionee S6s | Oppo F1s |
End Consumer Price | 17000 | 16000 | 19000 |
Display | 5.5” HD IPS 2.5 D | 5.5” FHD IPS 2.5D | 5.5” HD IPS 2.5 D |
Display Qualitative | Brighter | Colorful | |
Rear Camera | 13 MP Sony IMX258 1/3.06”, PDAF, F2.0 | 13 MP Sony IMX258 1/3.06”, PDAF, F2.0 | 13 MP 1/3.06”, PDAF, F2.2 |
Front Camera | 8 MP, F2.0 | 8 MP, 1.4?, F2.2 | 16 MP |
Design | CNC, Series-5 Metal, Unibody | Inferior to Z25 | Better than Z25 |
ID Thickness | 8.5mm | 8.3 mm | 7.4 mm |
2.5D Effect | More vertical and higher R-No than Gionee | ||
ROM | 32 GB, expandable to 128 GB | 32 GB, expandable to 128 GB | 64 GB, expandable to 128 GB |
RAM | 4 GB | 3 GB | 4 GB |
Processor | 1.5 GHz Octa Core, 64-Bit | Octa Core, 1.3 GHz | 1.5 GHz Octa Core, 64-Bit |
Chipset | MT6750 | MTK 6753 | MT6750 |
3G/4G | 4G+, Supports CA, Cat-6 | 4G, Cat-4 | 4G+ |
CA | Yes | Yes | |
Battery | 3020 mAh Li-Poly | 3150 mAh | 3075 Li-Poly |
OS | Marshmallow, 6.0 | Marshmallow, 6.0 | Marshmallow, 6.0 |
Fingerprint | Yes, Fastest in this segment | Yes | Yes |
OTG | yes | Yes | Yes |
Parameter | Lava Z25 | Vivo V5 | Samsung J7 Prime (2016) | Oppo A57 | Comparison |
End Consumer Price | 17000 | 18000 | 16900 | 15000 | Best among Competition |
Display | 5.5” HD IPS 2.5 D | 5.5’’ HD IPS | 5.5” HD AMOLED | 5.2’’ HD IPS | At par |
Display Qualitative | Brighter | Brighter | Colorful | Consumer would prefer Z25 Display over S6s | |
Rear Camera | 13 MP Sony IMX258 1/3.06”, PDAF, F2.0 | 13 MP PDAF | 13 MP F1.9 | 13MP,F2.2 , PDAF | Better than S6s and Samsung J7 Prime |
Front Camera | 8 MP, F2.0 | 20 MP | 8 MP, F1.9 | 16MP,F2.0 | Better than Gionee S6s, Vivo V5 and at par with Oppo F1s |
Design | CNC, Series-5 Metal, Unibody | Inferior to Z25 | Metal, inferior to Z25 | Better than Gionee S6s | Better than Gionee S6s |
ID Thickness | 8.5mm | 7.5 mm | 7.8 mm | 7.65mm | |
2.5D Effect | More vertical and higher R-No than Gionee | ||||
ROM | 32 GB, expandable to 128 GB | 32 GB, expandable to 128 GB | 16 GB, expandable to 128 GB | 32 GB, expandable to 256 GB | At par |
RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB | 3 GB | 3GB | At par |
Processor | 1.5 GHz Octa Core, 64-Bit | 1.5 GHz Octa Core, 64-Bit | Octa Core | Octa-core | At par |
Chipset | MT6750 | MT6750 | Snapdragon 617, MSM 8952 (4*1.0 GHz + 4*1.6 GHz) | Qualcomm MSM8940 | Better than Samsung J7 prime in Multi-tasking. Better than Gionee S6s in App loading time and gaming performance. |
3G/4G | 4G+, Supports CA, Cat-6 | 4G+ | 4G+ | 4G | At par |
CA | Yes | Yes | Yes | At par | |
Battery | 3020 mAh Li-Poly | 3000 mAh | 3300 mAh | 2900mAh | At par |
OS | Marshmallow, 6.0 | Marshmallow, 6.0 | Marshmallow, 6.0 | Marshmallow, 6.0 | At par |
Fingerprint | Yes, Fastest in this segment | Yes | Yes | Yes | Faster and more feature-rich than Industry |
OTG | yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | At par |